TikTok Shop Product Detail Lookup (by Product ID)

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "product_id"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "region": {
      "type": "string",
      "default": "SG",
      "examples": [
        "SG"
      ],
      "description": "Region code"
    },
    "product_id": {
      "type": "string",
      "examples": [
        "1732108663255959373"
      ],
      "description": "Product ID"
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}

{
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "valid": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Whether the given product_id passed the endpoint's own format check. Observed `false` for an out-of-range product_id (e.g. '0', bit_length=0, expected 50-64). Never observed `true` -- no fixture captured a product_id that both passed the format check and resolved to a real listing. Absent entirely on the empty not-found shape."
    },
    "message": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Bilingual (Chinese/English) explanation of why the given product_id was rejected, e.g. an out-of-range bit length. Only present on the validation-error shape observed."
    },
    "product_id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Echoes back the product_id supplied in the request. Only present on the validation-error shape observed; absent on the empty not-found shape."
    }
  },
  "description": "The result object, as returned at routing.responseResultPath ($.output). Only two shapes have been observed: a malformed/out-of-range product_id returns `{valid, product_id, message}` describing why the ID was rejected; a syntactically valid but nonexistent product_id returns an empty object `{}` (billed $0). A genuinely found product's own detail fields (title, price, images, seller, etc.) were not captured by either fixture and are UNCONFIRMED -- this schema describes only the two observed shapes.",
  "additionalProperties": true
}